While the Supreme Court has ruled that computer-generated images based on real children are illegal, the Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition decision complicates efforts to criminalize fully AI-generated content. Many states have enacted laws against AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM), but these may conflict with the Ashcroft ruling. The difficulty in distinguishing real from fake images due to AI advancements may necessitate new legal approaches to protect minors effectively. Child pornography, now called child sexual abuse material or CSAM is not a victimless crime.

Sky News footer

• In Washington, the US Department of Justice said separately the site operated “the largest child sexual exploitation market by volume of content” when it was taken down.
• Our elearning courses will help you manage, assess and respond to sexual harassment and abuse in primary and secondary schools.
• The Financial Times recently called it «the hottest social media platform in the world».
• A software engineer charged with generating hyper-realistic sexually explicit images of children.

There are specialized therapists who work with adults who are having sexual feelings towards children, or who have other questions or concerns about their sexual feelings, thoughts and/or behaviors. Missing children are increasingly being linked to OnlyFans videos, says the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), known as a global clearing house for reports of child sexual exploitation. While it is illegal to post or share explicit images of someone under the age of 18, Mr Bailey says the police are extremely reluctant to criminalise children for such offences. He says he is more concerned about the risks children are exposing themselves to by appearing on the site. Our Think Before You Share campaign aims to help young people understand the harm of sharing explicit images and videos of themselves, and others, and encourage parents and educators to start timely conversations with children and young people. Speaking to eNCA following the arrest of a Midrand couple accused of possessing and distributing at least 10 million child sexual abuse videos and images, Ephraim Tlhako from the Film and Publication Board said there is renewed concern about the crime.

Is it illegal to use children’s photos to fantasize?

Perhaps the most important part of the Ashcroft decision for emerging issues around AI-generated child sexual abuse material was part of the statute that the Supreme Court did not strike down. That provision of the law prohibited «more common and lower tech means of creating virtual (child sexual abuse material), known as computer morphing,» which involves taking pictures of real minors and morphing them into sexually explicit depictions. Learning that someone you know has been viewing child sexual abuse material (child pornography) must have been very shocking, and it’s normal to feel angry, disgusted, scared, or confused – or all of these things at once. Even though this person is not putting their hands on a child, this is child sexual abuse and yes, it should be reported.

In some cases a fascination with child sexual abuse material can be an indicator for acting out abuse with a child. CSAM is illegal because it is filming an actual crime (i.e., child sexual abuse). Children can’t legally consent to sexual activity, and so they cannot participate in pornography. It may also include encouraging youth to send sexually explicit pictures of themselves which is considered child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The U.S. Department of Justice defines CSAM, or child pornography, as any sexually explicit images or videos involving a minor (children and teens under 18 years old). The legal definition of sexually explicit does not mean that an image or video has to depict a child or teen engaging in sex.

More than 200 Australians have collectively paid more than $1.3 million to watch live streamed child sexual abuse filmed in the Philippines. While the internet’s architecture has always made it difficult to control what is shared online, there are a few kinds of content that most regulatory authorities across the globe agree should be censored. I understand that this might be awkward and difficult, but it doesn’t need to be accusatory or judgmental. You may want to start by expressing how difficult this is to talk about and also say how much you care for him (if that’s true).

Law enforcement agencies across the U.S. are cracking down on a troubling spread of child sexual abuse imagery created through artificial intelligence technology — from manipulated photos of real children to graphic depictions of computer-generated kids. Justice Department officials say they’re aggressively going after offenders who exploit AI tools, while states are racing to ensure people generating “deepfakes” and other harmful imagery of kids can be prosecuted under their laws. With the recent significant advances in AI, it can be difficult if not impossible for law enforcement officials to distinguish between images child porn of real and fake children. Lawmakers, meanwhile, are passing a flurry of legislation to ensure local prosecutors can bring charges under state laws for AI-generated “deepfakes” and other sexually explicit images of kids. Governors in more than a dozen states have signed laws this year cracking down on digitally created or altered child sexual abuse imagery, according to a review by The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.